The Office of the Research, Development, and Extension (RDE) of Capiz State University tallied a total of 90 research proposals presented by faculty researchers during the CAPSU RDE 36th University In-House Review held on March 01, 2024, at the Capiz State University Roxas City campus.
The papers presented were classified into Social Science, Food, Developmental/Engineering, Natural/Biological, and Extension categories. For the Social Science category, a total of 31 research proposals were presented; for the food research category, a total of 15 research proposals; for the Developmental/Engineering, there were 14 proposals presented; Natural/Biological, 11; and for the Extension category a total of 19 research proposals presented.
The papers were evaluated by a panel of experts and practitioners in the fields. The evaluators for the different categories are:
Social Science Category
- Dr. Louis Placido F. Lachica, SSITRDC Director
- Mr. Ronald Amigo, CENRO (Capiz Environment Head
- Rev. Fr. Michael Vasquez, Associate Dean, CPC Graduate School
- Dr. Nenita A. Beluso, Dean of CPC Graduate School
Food/ Developmental/ Engineering Category
- Engr. Gerbe B. Dellava, Former ARD for Finance and Admin Services DOST VI
- Dr. Edna M. Nava, Former FFRDC Director CAPSU
- Dr. Pastor Jones T. Denusta, Consortium Director, WESVAARRDEC
Extension Category
- Mr. Vianney T. Ojerio, OIC, Assistant Center Director ATI Training Center
- Dr. Emilita P. Solante, Former University Extension Director (CAPSU)
- Prof. Jocelyn S. Legaspi, University Extension Director (CAPSU)
Natural/ Biological Category
- Dr. Salvacion J. Legaspi, CSRDC Director, CAPSU
- Dr. Stephanie Pimentel, FFRDC Director, CAPSU
- Dr. Aljen P. Vasquez, OIC Chief Research Div. WESVIARC
The In-House review is an essential process that allows CAPSU-RDE to ensure the quality and integrity of the research within its walls.This further ensures that the researches conducted are relevant to the CAPSU RDE’s research agenda and priorities while maintaining the highest possible standards in terms of methodology and ethical standards.